Paper: Multi-national companies and the development of humanitarian technologies: What principles come first—and how does it affect the acceptance by humanitarians?

Paper details

Paper authors Isabelle Schlaepfer
In panel on Taking ideology out of humanitarianism? The everyday, corporate interests and the politics of global solidarity
Paper presenter(s) will be presenting In-Person / Online

Abstract

The engagement of multi-national businesses in humanitarian action has long been a controversial topic, especially their impact on humanitarian principles. The literature has often been accompanied by a morally led debate but hampered in part by a lack of empirical evidence. One area that has been specifically neglected within this discussion is the importance of businesses in the provision of humanitarian technologies – defined here as both, digital and web-based software as well as tangible ‘things’ such as products – which are developed, designed, or adjusted for a humanitarian market. This article aims to investigate to what extent the development is committed to humanitarian principles, and how this affects humanitarians’ validation of such technologies. By using a qualitative case study design of a corporate technology, this article is based in a critical realist narrative analysis of documents and semi-structured interviews. One of the main findings is that corporate principles are prioritised over humanitarian principles. However, while humanitarian principles might be compromised, they do not tend to be a necessary condition for humanitarian actors to accept or reject a humanitarian technology neither. This article discusses that principled aid has been challenged in the aftermath of restructuring the humanitarian sector towards a humanitarian market; and concludes that this process is accelerated through the constant release of corporate technologies sweeping the humanitarian realm.

Back

Presenters

Isabelle Schlaepfer
University of Bern