Paper details
| Paper authors | Haneebal Alfirjani |
| In panel on | Humanitarian Aid Workers: Ethics, Altruism, and Best Practices |
| Paper presenter(s) will be presenting |
|
Abstract
The protracted crisis in Libya since 2011, characterized by fragmented governance, competing authorities in the East and west of the country, the influence of armed groups, tribal dynamics and geopolitical interference, creates an environment full of unique challenges for humanitarian workers. This paper critically examines the deep tension between universal humanitarian principles (neutrality, impartiality, independence, humanity) and the complex and often contradictory realities faced by both Libyan and international aid workers. She argues that this friction generates a significant "moral gap", as global frameworks struggle to provide adequate guidance or legitimacy in the volatile and politicized context of Libya.
Drawing on empirical research and practitioners ' experiences, the paper explores specific ethical dilemmas arising from this gap: navigating demands for neutrality when negotiating access with disputed armed groups or authorities; applying neutrality amid power dynamics and donor priorities conflicting with local needs; and adhering to global accountability standards in vulnerable institutional environments.
Most importantly, it looks at how workers are bridging this gap – examining adaptive strategies, contextual interpretations of principles, practical ethical thinking used to make operational decisions while preserving humanitarian intentions, and highlighting the vital role of Libyan national staff.
Furthermore, the paper assesses the psychological and social losses that this negotiation exerts on workers trapped between priorities and necessities at the ground level and the urgent need to go beyond rigid global frameworks. Bridging this gap is essential for effective, accountable and sustainable humanitarian action in Libya.
