Paper details

Paper authors	Andrew Seal
In panel on	What have we learned about adapting research methodologies for use in humanitarian crisis contexts?
Paper presenter(s) will be presenting	In-Person / Online

Abstract

The aim of research in humanitarian contexts should be to deliver evidence of the highest possible grade to inform decision making for improved outcomes. However, such research often risks insecurity, challenges logistic and HR capacities, and may raise ethical dilemmas. Before adaptation of methods and implementation, the VALUE of the study needs to be estimated, i.e. the: Validity of the research question; Adequacy of the data that we can realistically collect in the context; Likelihood of study success; Uptake by donors and other decision makers likely to be influenced by the findings; and Estimated public health impact if changes in policy and practice are made as a result of the study. When assessment of the VALUE criteria favours going ahead, method adaptation may be required for implementation. This may involve simplification, increasing speed and flexibility, and rapid innovation. Methods are continuing to evolve with increased use of information technology, mixed methods, and ‘big data’. Yet, as access is also, probably, worsening remote research management is increasingly important. Data validation at a distance is powerful but has inherent limitations that technology can only partially overcome. The paper will discuss the lessons learnt on pragmatic method adaptation over more than 15 years of nutrition and health research in humanitarian contexts.

Back