Paper details
| Paper authors | Haneebal Mohammed Alsagheer Alfirjani |
| In panel on | The politics of humanitarian negotiations |
| Paper presenter(s) will be presenting |
|
Abstract
In Libyan context presents a complex and volatile environment for humanitarian negotiations, characterized by political fragmentation, competing armed groups, and shifting alliances. This paper examines the unique challenges faced by humanitarian actors operating in Libya, where the absence of a unified central authority complicates access to vulnerable populations and the delivery of aid. It explores how local and international organizations navigate the intricate web of political and military actors to secure agreements, ensure safety, and uphold humanitarian principles.
The study highlights case studies of successful and failed negotiations, analyzing the strategies employed—such as localized diplomacy, community engagement, and leveraging tribal networks—to gain access and mitigate risks. It also addresses the ethical dilemmas inherent in negotiating with non-state actors and the potential consequences of such engagements. By focusing on Libya, the paper contributes to broader discussions on the politics of humanitarianism in conflict zones, offering insights into adaptive approaches for operating in fragmented states. The findings aim to inform policymakers and practitioners on effective negotiation tactics while emphasizing the need for context-sensitive solutions in Libya’s evolving crisis.
